Dollar Cost Averaging, Investor Caution, and the Search for Stability in 1973 America
When readers picked up the July 1, 1973 issue of Forbes Magazine, they were holding more than just another business journal. They were staring into the economic uncertainty of an America caught between inflation, market volatility, and shifting investment philosophies. This particular issue featured a detailed article titled “Dollar Cost Averaging: Get Rich Slow? Or Get Rich Never?” — a probing analysis of one of Wall Street’s most popular strategies.
For investors of the time, the piece was not merely financial advice. It was a reflection of a nation wrestling with questions of growth, security, and risk. Could the steady hand of dollar cost averaging protect wealth in an era when inflation was eroding purchasing power? Or was it just another myth that investors clung to in order to feel safe?
The early 1970s were marked by a series of economic tensions. The U.S. was dealing with the lingering aftershocks of the Bretton Woods collapse in 1971, which severed the dollar’s link to gold and ushered in an era of floating exchange rates. Inflation was steadily rising, fueled by deficit spending from the Vietnam War and domestic programs. By 1973, storm clouds of the coming oil crisis were beginning to gather.
For Wall Street, this was an age of both opportunity and anxiety. The bull market of the 1960s had given way to stagnation and uncertainty. Investors sought methods that promised stability in a turbulent world. Dollar cost averaging (DCA) — the practice of investing a fixed dollar amount at regular intervals regardless of stock price — seemed to offer that reassurance.
But Forbes was asking a deeper question: was this strategy truly effective, or was it simply a comforting illusion for the cautious investor?
By 1973, Forbes had established itself as a leading authority in financial journalism. Unlike magazines that reported news headlines or leaned on abstract theory, Forbes specialized in clear, data-driven, and sometimes contrarian analysis.
In this issue, the magazine dissected the mathematics behind dollar cost averaging. Using real examples — stocks like AT&T, IBM, Exxon, Coca-Cola, General Motors, Procter & Gamble, and Xerox — Forbes put the theory to the test across a five-year period. The results were sobering: while DCA worked in certain cases, it often underperformed against chance itself.
This wasn’t just investment commentary; it was a lesson in skepticism. At a time when millions of Americans were seeking safety from market swings, Forbes reminded readers that no formula could shield them completely from risk.
The cover of the July 1973 issue symbolized Forbes’ reputation for authority and seriousness. While Life Magazine used bold photography to dramatize global events, Forbes relied on understated, text-driven design to project credibility and depth.
Inside, the DCA article was accompanied by tables and charts — tools that made the analysis clear to both professional financiers and everyday readers. The juxtaposition of cold data with plain, unembellished commentary reflected Forbes’ editorial style: direct, unsentimental, and practical.
This set Forbes apart. Where others leaned on optimism or promotional narratives, Forbes positioned itself as the voice of reason and restraint — a quality that made the magazine indispensable during turbulent economic times.
-
The Mathematics of DCA – The article explained that by investing fixed sums regularly, investors buy more shares when prices are low and fewer when prices are high, theoretically lowering average cost.
-
The Test Period – Forbes tracked 21 hypothetical purchases across leading stocks between 1967–1972, a volatile five-year stretch.
-
The Results – For eight of the twelve stocks tested, the average cost using DCA exceeded the median market price. In many cases, investors would have done better simply buying at random.
-
The Illusion of Safety – The analysis showed that while DCA softened the emotional blow of market swings, it did not consistently deliver superior returns.
-
The Big Names Studied – Household corporate giants like AT&T, Coca-Cola, General Electric, IBM, and Xerox were central to the study — underscoring that even blue-chip stocks weren’t immune to weak performance.
-
The Role of Commissions – Transaction fees ate into DCA’s supposed advantages, further weakening its long-term performance.
-
The Broader Lesson – Forbes concluded that discipline mattered more than formulas. No system could replace judgment, patience, and awareness of market cycles.
For collectors today, this issue holds special significance. It captures the mindset of American investors on the eve of the 1973–74 stock market crash, one of the worst downturns since the Great Depression.
-
Historical Timing – Published just months before the oil embargo and subsequent market collapse, the article serves as a time capsule of pre-crisis optimism and caution.
-
Corporate Icons – With coverage of AT&T, IBM, and Coca-Cola, it documents the trajectory of companies that shaped global business.
-
Cultural Relevance – The debate over safe, formulaic investing vs. bold, active strategies remains relevant in today’s markets, making this issue a bridge between past and present.
-
Collector Demand – Vintage Forbes magazines from transitional periods in the economy are highly sought after. They are valued not only for their financial insight but also as original artifacts of economic history.
Like Life’s wartime photography, Forbes’ financial reporting endures because it goes beyond surface-level news. Issues like this remind us that every economic era wrestles with uncertainty — whether it’s war, inflation, or market cycles.
The July 1, 1973 issue shows that even then, investors were searching for formulas to control an uncontrollable market. Today, with modern debates over passive vs. active investing, cryptocurrency, and index funds, the lessons of Forbes’ skepticism toward DCA feel strikingly familiar.
For collectors and historians, this issue is a window into 1970s investing culture, when calculators and hand-drawn charts guided decisions instead of algorithms and AI.
If you’re fascinated by the evolution of investing strategies and want to see the ideas that shaped Wall Street during one of its most pivotal decades, this issue is a must-have.
👉 Browse our full collection of original Forbes magazines here:
Original Forbes Magazines Collection
From the boom years of the 1960s to the turbulence of the 1970s and beyond, Forbes documented not just numbers, but the spirit of American business itself.
The July 1, 1973 Forbes Magazine stands as a landmark in financial journalism. Its article on dollar cost averaging stripped away illusions and forced investors to confront uncomfortable truths: that no strategy is foolproof, and that discipline, not formulas, builds wealth.
Holding this issue today is like holding a moment when America stood at the edge of economic upheaval — when investors clung to simple strategies while the world around them was about to shift dramatically.
For anyone who values history, vintage Forbes magazines are more than financial reading. They are artifacts of our economic past — reminders that the search for security, stability, and prosperity is as old as the markets themselves.